Archive for June, 2006

A Quantum Leap in V8 File Corruption Repair

Wednesday, 7 June 2006

New FileFixer release fixes the most destructive form of V8 design file corruption ever reported.

CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, USA — The newest version of FileFixer for V8 now offers Search and Repair capabilities that handle the most frequently occurring new forms of file corruption, unique to V8. What are these new forms of file corruption? In order to fully understand these new forms of corruption, a little background information about the new V8 design file format is necessary.

Your V8 files contain many more subfiles and subfolders than those shown in this simplified illustration.

V8 Design File Structure
Each MicroStation V8 file contains multiple subfiles and subfolders.

The “Models” subfolder contains the visible geometry (graphical elements). Non-graphical, model-specific elements, such as reference file attachments, are also stored here. There are additional subfolders and subfiles nested in this folder — more about that in a minute.

The “Non-model” subfolder contains shared information, such as level definitions, shared cell definitions and fonts. One or more models in each V8 design file use this information.

The “File Properties” subfile contains Windows file properties, such as the document’s author, subject, comments, keywords — the familiar file properties viewable using Windows Explorer or by selecting File | Properties from MicroStation V8′s main menu.

Microsoft Word and Excel files are also organized this way. This internal file organization is called structured storage.

The above illustration is a simplified representation of the internal organization of V8 design files. Brace yourself — here come the gory details. The following illustrates the additional detail actually found in each healthy V8 design file:

Your V8 files contain many more subfiles and subfolders than those shown in this simplified illustration.

V8 design file’s internal structure
Any one of these subfolders and subfiles can be damaged and inaccessible — and inspection of customer V8 files reveals these subfolders and subfiles do become corrupted. This is the most common new form of V8 file corruption: structured storage corruption.

How do I know I have structured-storage corruption?
The most alarming symptom of structured-storage corruption is the following cryptic dialog box:

Translation: “Help me, FileFixer. You’re my only hope.”

This message displays when the internal structured storage framework of a V8 file is pulverized — no known application besides FileFixer can open or repair a V8 file in this condition.

The good news is that the lines and circles and cells nested within the wreckage are often intact, but damage to the subfolder and subfile structure of the file prevents their access — until now.

File Recovery Techniques
Completely new file recovery techniques had to be developed to salvage elements from such damaged files. The new approach is analogous to the famous Norton Undelete, which salvages “deleted” files from a hard drive. When FileFixer detects severely damaged internal file structure, it reads through the entire file looking for healthy pieces of the original file. The healthy pieces are recombined into a healthy V8 design file.

Disappearing Elements
But you won’t always encounter the cryptic dialog message illustrated above. Structured storage damage can destroy chunks of a V8 design file without warning — and no error dialog is displayed. One damaged subfile or subfolder can prevent access to the remainder of your model. The symptom of such file damage is elements that disappear from view.

In the following illustration, subfile 5 is damaged and elements stored in the remaining subfiles 6-20 (containing more than 75% of the drawing’s geometry) are not displayed:

A damaged subfile prevents access to remaining subfiles.

And, even more insidious, a missing subfile can also prevent remaining geometry from displaying. In the following illustration, subfile 5 is missing. Elements in the remaining subfiles 6-20 will not display:

A missing subfile prevents access to remaining subfiles.

But you can relax — Axiom has handled the tough part. The new release of FileFixer for V8 detects and handles structured storage corruption. All you have to do is click <Start>.

Bentley connects MicroStation to Google Earth.

Wednesday, 7 June 2006

EXTON, PENNSYLVANIA, USA — Bentley recently announced that it has developed software to import MicroStation design file data into Google Earth, a free program that combines satellite imagery, maps and the power of Google Search to put the world’s geographic information at a user’s fingertips. For the first time, users can view 2D and 3D models in the exact geographic environment where they will be constructed.

Google Earth allows a user to type an address into a search bar. The program then zooms in on that location, showing a satellite image of the area. It can also superimpose a road map over the satellite image. The new MicroStation functionality allows users to import design file data into Google Earth, giving MicroStation users the unprecedented ability to quickly see projects in the geographical context they will be in.

Google Earth showing the Bentley headquarters in Exton, Pennsylvania.

“The Google Earth connection is fantastic for our users, who work on major assets placed on or in the earth,” stated Ray Bentley, lead developer. “The feedback regarding the connection has been great — beta users around the world are inspired by their new ability to view this work inside the Google Earth environment.”

MicroStation users can export their DGN and DWG models of infrastructure assets being designed, approved or maintained directly to the Google Earth environment. Here, the models can be viewed in the context of the rich geographic and demographic data available in Google Earth, including near-by buildings, highways, roads, geographic boundaries, bodies of water and census information.

Essentially, a user exports a design file into the Google Earth file format (KLM file), including all level, reference and saved view information. Then, from within Google Earth, users can manipulate any of these just like they can in MicroStation. For example:

  • All included levels available to the MicroStation user are carried over into the KML file (KML, or Keyhole Markup Language, is an XML-based language for managing three-dimensional geospatial data in Google Earth) so the Google Earth user can easily turn levels on and off.
  • Saved views in MicroStation are transferred to the KML file, so the Google Earth user can easily move through pre-configured perspectives in the model.
  • Embedded links within a MicroStation file will be automatically exported as Google Earth Placemarks, which allow the Google Earth user to quickly navigate to supporting project data.
  • MicroStation GeoGraphics coordinate systems are automatically exported to the real geographic locations in Google Earth.
  • MicroStation raster imagery can be exported to Google Earth to replace or augment the Google Earth imagery.

Moreover, the MicroStation files imported into Google Earth will maintain any links to Excel spreadsheets, Word documents, PDF documents, URLs and additional DGNs and DWG files – enabling diverse project information to be viewable in the Google Earth interface.

Joe Croser, Global Marketing Director for Bentley’s platform products added, “The most exciting thing about [MicroStation's] Google Earth [functionality] is that it facilitates richer visualization for everyone involved in a project — from designers on through to the public. I like to think of it as ‘grounding design’ by placing the project [in its natural position].”

Bentley SELECT subscribers can download the new connection software now for use with MicroStation V8 2004 Edition. The capability is delivered with MicroStation V8 XM Edition.

The Foot Controversy and the State Plane Coordinate System

Wednesday, 7 June 2006

Many of our readers provided more specific feedback regarding our March tip on the difference between the International Foot and the Survey Foot. Click Survey vs International Foot to see the original article. Below are two letters to the editor that provide some additional insight on this issue.

Dear Editor,
While in one respect you are correct, surveyors using electronic distance measuring devices can not measure a distance to a precision of 2ppm (parts per million, or 0.002 feet in 1000 feet), that is not the issue. The real issue is when this 2ppm difference is applied to State Plane coordinates in the N2,000,000 and E6,000,000 range! This 2ppm literally moves a State Plane coordinate position 4 feet by 12 feet, using the coordinate values listed. [Clarification: The coordinate of N2,000,000, E6,000,000 is arbitrary, for the purposes of simple math. It is a location near Half Moon Bay, California.]

With more and more projects being based on State Plane coordinates, this issue is going to be more and more prevalent. Working on projects in many States, CH2M Hill is well aware of the problems presented when users mix Survey Foot and International Foot units. In nearly all cases it is simply lack of user awareness or a project that has not been set up correctly.

Imagine you complete a design in rural California using State Plane coordinates based on International Foot units. This information is then passed on to a surveyor for staking.

Surveyors are aware that California uses Survey Foot units. Many survey software packages convert the foot units on the fly, but because of this discrepancy, you will then find out that the design being constructed will be 4 feet by 12 feet out of position. You would quickly come to the realization that 2ppm matters!
Joe Feyder,
CH2M HILL
Sacramento, California

Dear Editor,
United States Geodetic Survey coordinates given in meters need to be converted to the “old survey foot” with the proper conversion factor (12″/39.37″) on a computer calculator with as many decimal places as possible. This increases the accuracy of the measurement. Also, take great care in mixing the MicroStation conversion (by referencing by coincident world, a metric drawing, for example) because it uses the international factor. The only reliable way to reference a metric drawing is to make sure it also lines-ups to a similar point or alignment converted and displayed (in both the foot drawing and the metric drawing) by InRoads, because InRoads geometry transformation (feet-meters or meters-feet) employs the “old survey foot” factor.
David Mild,
STV Group
Douglassville, Pennsylvania

30-year engineering veteran shares his MicroStation productivity secrets.

Wednesday, 7 June 2006

FORT WORTH, TEXAS, USA — As a 30-year engineering veteran, Arturo Gonzales of Carter & Burgess knows the complications that can occur when trying to coordinate people with the goal of achieving a common target, like completing a project on time. To get people coordinated, Arturo has integrated MicroStation Productivity Toolkit into his workflow to maximize efficiency and ensure design file uniformity.

Arturo Gonzales, Carter & Burges

When asked how he unites his group to end up with the best possible outcome for everyone involved his answer was, “I go to my Toolkit and solve whatever issue arises with one of my many remedies.”

Read on for more details on how Arturo uses MicroStation Productivity Toolkit to keep his projects on track.

MicroStation Today: How did you get into CAD?
Arturo: I have been in the engineering field for over thirty years. My first job was as a surveyor during my senior year of high school. After college, I moved to the Dallas/Fort Worth area (Texas) and worked as a drafter for a structural steel company. Then, I made my way into the civil engineering field and was introduced to CAD, and a few years later, to MicroStation.

During my career, I have accomplished some noteworthy milestones. First: introducing CAD to two engineering firms and helping them implement CAD standards. Second: teaching CAD professionally for two years. Third: being involved in the start-up of a CAD user group in the Phoenix, Arizona area.

I am the go-to guy. I am regularly asked by my employers to lead or be involved in educating other employees and researching new products to keep the company competitive in the marketplace.

MST: Can you give some details on what you do?
Arturo: I work with the design of 1,000,000+ square feet distribution centers, across the United States. I will usually start with exhibits for local agencies to review our concept. Then, I will lay out our site design. From there, others in our group will begin their designs for storm drain and grading. I will later on, start creating designs for utilities, paving and erosion protection. Also, I review designs for basic concept uniformity. I ensure that company standards are being followed. This entails quality-controlling the plans at periodic points in the design stage.

MST: How do Axiom utilities help you with those issues?
Arturo: I really cannot do without FileFixer, RefManager and RefFence.

Design file corruption has been a common issue that has been easy to overcome with FileFixer. I get called often to find out why the DGN files won’t act normally. When others have exhausted their ideas, I will usually end up repairing the files with FileFixer. Being trained on FileFixer has helped tremendously.

Also, supervising design updates and file revisions across disciplines has been made easier with RefManager and RefFence. Routinely, when we start up a new project, we need to change file names and references in all the DGN files for a project. This can add up to over a hundred sheets, just for the civil files. RefManager is invaluable in this scenario and has made this a much simpler task.

Finally, DgnCompare is a wonderful tool to note, as it distinguishes between revisions and shows me how changes effect the concept of our overall design.

MST: How have Axiom products benefited your company?
Arturo: I know many man-hours are saved when we use these products. I can only imagine what the dollar savings are. What I do know is this ? not staying late to rebuild or revise drawings is priceless.

MST: Thank you, Arturo.
Arturo: Thank you for this article. After 30+ years in the engineering field, I am very humbled by your company’s recognition.